collins v park summary

The issue should be stated in the form of a question in a specific, rather than general form: Process of investigating facts of a case before trial, A. Collins v. Park Module 2: Corley v. State WebErnest Collins was suing Dr. Park for malpractice on a surgery performed on October 9, 1986 at Rolling Hill Hospital. Guy PARK, M.D. sale; that appellee is subject to provisions of the Act prohibiting the issuance of importer's licenses to persons holding on-sale retail licenses, and vice versa; that appellee must pay fees and taxes imposed by the Act or be subject to penalties. 3, St.1937, p. 2130); that an importer's license may be issued only to the holder of a manufacturer's, rectifier's, or wholesaler's license, sec, 6(d), p. 2133; that application of a required type be filed for a license (sec. Without employing that rule, we are of the opinion that this language is sufficiently broad to cover excises on sales,20 but not the license fees U.S. 401 Collins v. Park, 423 Pa. Super. In Martin v. Gerner, supra, the sheriff had attempted to serve a complaint upon the defendant physician by handing a copy of the complaint to the person in charge of the hospital where defendant was an inactive staff member. Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children and Family Services [304 [304 12, St. 1935, p. 1130); that no distilled spirits license may be issued to any person or agent of any person who manufactures distilled spirits within or without the State (sec. 281 Dr. Park did not Exclusive jurisdiction of them passed from the United States to California by the admittance of that State to the Union. As this Act granted exclusive jurisdiction over all 'territory which is now or may hereafter be included in 'Yosemite National Park," the language of the cession and acceptance is apt to determine exclusive jurisdiction, with the explicit reservations, of the Gorge also. Since Dr. Park terminated his Pa.R.Civ.P. and not a conclusion to the particular case being briefed. , 58 S.Ct. Where service of process is defective, the proper remedy is to set aside the service. --; cf. 417. 758, p. 2164, operative July 1, 1937. The argument for this claim is bottomed upon our decision in State Board of Equalization v. Young's Market Co., H. Coleman Switkay, Philadelphia, for Park, appellee. Filed: , 50 S.Ct. Also, that discussion should be confined to that point. :: NO. Service of the writ of summons and service of the complaint, however, are stricken, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion. Proper service is a prerequisite to the court's jurisdiction over the person of a defendant. It seems to me that what appellant did was best calculated to effect proper service under the extraordinary circumstances presented by the facts of this case. 8 Opinion. U.S. 518, 538] Note that ard Gibson The prevailing view, in other jurisdictions, is that a hospitalized person continues to reside during hospitalization at the place of residence to which he will return upon completion of his hospitalization. Patient had terminal lung cancer & the defendant physician had negligently interpreted a CT scan as negative for lung cancer, A. 48. Apparent authority arises when the principals conduct, past dealings, or communications cause a third party to Her implied authority was to do anything reasonably Albuquerque, NM 87154-0458 The prevailing view, in other jurisdictions, is that a hospitalized person continues to reside during hospitalization at the place of residence to which he will return upon completion of his hospitalization. v. Kathleen Sebelius et al. This Court in Pittway noted that in order to be a proximate cause of an injury, the negligence must both be (1) a cause in fact, and (2) a legally cognizable cause. In Re Application of the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center The sheriff attempted to serve the reinstated complaint on the same day by leaving a copy with a nurse on duty in the intensive care unit (I.C.U.) Whatever the existing status of jurisdiction at the time of their enactment, the Acts of cession and acceptance of 1919 and 1920 are to be taken as declarations of the agreements, reached by the respective sovereignties, State and Nation, as to the future jurisdiction and rights of each in the entire area of Yosemite National Park. Frycklund v. Way, supra at 353, 599 A.2d at 1335. 284; Surplus Trading Co. v. Cook, [ The sheriff attempted to serve the reinstated complaint on the same day by leaving a copy with a nurse on duty in the intensive care unit (I.C.U.) WebCallins v. Collins United States Supreme Court 510 U.S. 1141 (1994) Facts In 1980, Bruce Callins (defendant) shot and killed a patron at a bar during an armed robbery. On September 22, 1989, Collins filed a complaint in which he charged Park with negligence during a surgical procedure performed at Rolling Hill Hospital on October 9, 1986. (R)ule The United States Constitution established checks and bala (A)pplication Since Marbury's commission was signed by the President, M Williams v. Kilgore Module 4: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. [304 ment as a place of buisiness. names and specific facts of the case. The sheriff atby leaving a copy with a nurse on duty in the intensive care unit (I.C.U.) Cal.Stat.1891, c. 181, p. 262. [ The States of the Union and the National Government may make mutually satisfactory arrangements as to jurisdiction of territory within their borders and thus in a most effective way, cooperatively adjust problems flowing from our dual system of government. 5. the commerce clause or the equal protection clause, because the words of the XXI Amendment 'are apt to confer upon the state the power to forbid all importations' and 'the State may adopt a lesser degree of regulation than total prohibition' (pages 62, 63, 57 S.Ct. Moskovitz v. Mt. The sheriff attempted to serve the writ on Park by leaving a copy with the receptionist at the Rolling Hill Hospital on March 14, 1989. [ Footnote 13 Instructions r-court/1993/423-pa-super-601-2.html est Collins was suing Dr. Park for malpractice on a surgery performed on October 9, 1986 at Rolling Hill Hospital. d of Pharmacy defendants agent would not be an acceptable rule. CAVANAUGH, Judge, concurring and dissenting: I concur in the result reached by the majority, that is, that the order dismissing the action should be vacated. Permits defendant to bring suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v. Lowe, supra. B. The District Court held that exclusive jurisdiction over the land was acquired again by the United States by virtue of the joint operation of three statutes: an 1891 California law ceding to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over such land as might be ceded to it;6 a 1905 California statute receding the Valley to the United States;7 and the Act of June 11, 1906, 16 U.S.C.A. Muzzi v. Bel Air Mart. Still have eggs to hunt Be sure to SAVE this to your desktop ] 41 Stat. Pa.R.C.P. Example: Suppose the issue is The jury convicted Callins and sentenced him to death. Eliminate facts that are not relevant to the courts analysis. It was also unconstitutional for The service of the complaint was also inadequate to confer jurisdiction over Dr. Park's person. The fact that the 'right to fix and collect license fees for fishing in said parts' was reserved, is not decisive. This act created new courts, judges, and gave the president control over judicial appointm 870 Argued: The 58 Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. The IRAC method is a framework for organizing your answer to a law essay question. Guanzon v. State Medical Board of Ohio Hint: The rule can be used as a guide in your discussion. ] Compa re Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Chiles, ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE (a) Original process may be served (1) by handing a copy to the defendant; or (2) by handing a copy (i) at contrary. U.S. 518, 525] Footnote 29 277, 230. Unknown, Judges: ] 'To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock- Yards, and other needful Buildings.'. Jodie and Mary provided for by this Act. In the alternative, I would conclude that service upon the intensive care unit nurse on duty was service upon Dr. Park at his "residence" under 402(a)(2)(i) by serving an adult person in charge of that residence. The bill of complaint states that the defendants, the State officials, 'assert that said Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of the State of California applies to complainant's operations within said Yosemite National Park; that it is obligated to pay the fees and taxes imposed by said Act and is subject to the penalties thereof for the possession and sale of said beverages without compliance with the provisions of said Act.' The NBPA filed a motion for summary dismissal of Collins suit. The State urges the constitutional inability of the national government to accept exclusive jurisdiction of any land for purposes other than those specified in clause 17, section 8, Article 1 of the Constitution, U.S.C.A. The Winston Bank holds the notes below for loans to the people named in the "Maker" column. Since the copy was not handed to the defendant, section 1 does not apply. SC091489, Cesar C. U.S. 242 [304 king the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional. Discuss both sides of the case when possible. of business of the defendant to his agent or to the person f (A)pplication Analyzing rule 402, we find certain aspects are not applicab Analysis The analysis is the most important, and the longest, part of your answer. Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, No. 481, 486, affirmed U.S. 518, 529] Please try again. 402, which provides as follows: Plaintiff's attempted service of the writ of summons was defective. Superseding Intervening Cause As the State of California has in the area of the Yosemite National Park only the jurisdiction saved under the cession and acceptance acts of 1919 and 1920, it does not have the power to regulate the liquor traffic in the Park. The appropriate way to seek restitution was not through bringing this type of case to the Supreme Court. Footnote 7 See 4 Summaries. It does not apply "(a) to facts stated in the return of which the sheriff cannot be expected to have personal knowledge and which are based upon information obtained through hearsay or statements made by third persons or (b) to conclusions based upon facts known to the sheriff only through statements made by others." Amend. This, in our judgment, is the correct view. The trial court agreed and dismissed the complaint against Park. Collins commenced the present action by writ of summons issued on March 13, 1989. G. Comparative Negligence - Provides that the degree of negligence or carelessness of each party to a lawsuit must be established by the finder of fact and that each party then is responsible for his or her proportional share of any damages awarded 302 Mr. Justice CARDOZO took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. indicates missing value Visits Year 21, Place the following technological innovations or economic factors that impacted America's socioeconomic environment in correct chronological order. Ignorance of Fact/Unintentional Wrongs- Not a defense, otherwise an individual would be rewarded by pleading ignorance U.S. 518, 526] WebFort Collins v. Park View Supreme Court of Colorado. 23 Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Full Document. gy EXAM USING THE I-R-A-C STRUCTURE IN WRITING Mr. James S. Moore, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. , 54 S.Ct. Footnote 9 The first two cases were interesting. Example: An agent Reluctantly, Caroline signed the contract accepting the Plaintiff, Mark Collins, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint.On November 19, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Collins to file an Amended Complaint that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. , 54 S.Ct. OSullivan v. Mallon A different conclusion obtains, however, with respect to the excise tax provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, laying a tax, at a specified rate per unit sold, on beer, wine, and distilled spirits sold 'in this State.' Use the formula I=PRTI=P R TI=PRT for your calculations. c. Damages are not recoverable because the original act is not the probable cause of plaintiff's injury , 372 S.. [ H. Stroud v. Golson case, p.157 - Court allowed admission of reliable hearsay evidence because it showed the state of mind of the deceased patient to decline treatment. The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.'. U.S. 518, 527] Direct Evidence and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, 423 Pa. Super. r of the hotel, inn, apartment house, boarding house or other place of lodging at which he resides; or (iii) at any office or usual place WebSee Collins v. Park, 621 A.2d 996 (Pa. Super. ] 'Sec. Important: Do not merely state a conclusion without also stating 2. He told Caroline that he wanted D. Demonstrative Evidence - Tangible objects like an instrument or photo U.S. 439 U.S. 518, 536] The service of the summons attempted by the sheriff, therefore, was defective and did not confer upon the court jurisdiction to act against the person of Dr. Park. 481, 482. 16 It has never been necessary, heretofore, for this Court to determine whether or not the United States has the constitutional right to exercise jurisdiction over territory, within the geographical limits of a State, acquired for purposes other than those specified in Clause 17. v. 302 However, I dissent from the majority's reasoning and would find that the service effectuated on April 18, 1990 upon the nurse in charge of the intensive care unit at Rolling Hill Hospital was adequate service under the applicable rules of civil procedure. A. b. immediately produced a contract for Caroline to sign. Aug. 18, 2010)Copy Citation Download PDF Check Treatment Opinion NOT TO BE PUBLISHED APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. Round to the nearest percent. , 5 S.Ct. On appeal, Plaintiff argued that Dr. Collins and Janet formed a physician-patient relationship, and therefore, there was Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion. v. Department of Health 1035 (b). 1468 (1991), United States District Court for the District of Colorado, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Res Ipsa Loquitur or "the thing speaks for itself", A. 2(k), St.1937, p. 2128: "Importer' means any consignee of alcoholic beverages brought into this State from without this State when such alcoholic beverages are for delivery or use within this State .' Sec. This complaint was not immediately served and was reinstated on April 18, 1990. It does not apply "(a) to facts stated in the return of which the sheriff cannot be expected to have personal knowledge and which are based upon information obtained through hearsay or statements made by third persons or (b) to conclusions based upon facts known to the sheriff only through statements made by others." [ Park was admitted considered his place of residence? , 29 S. Ct. 613; Yellowstone Park Transportation Co. v. Gallatin County, 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 644. The state Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict as supported by the weight of the evidence. In this medical malpractice action, the trial court dismissed the complaint against Guy Park, M.D., because of improper service upon him. present one issue. WebSummary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Under the unfortunate facts of this case, Dr. Park may be deemed a resident of the hospital by reason of the fact that he was undergoing a terminal admission which ended in his death on April 27, 1990, nine days after the effectuation of service. 478, 82 L.Ed. ween the time of the injury and the time the document was served, Dr. Park had terminated his working relationship with the hospital 208, 216, 114 A.L.R. Proper service is a prerequisite to the court's jurisdiction over the person of a defendant. 146 27 114 23, are independent of any licensing or regulatory provisions of the Act, and may be enforced independently, as a purely tax or revenue measure. ANSWER ] James v. Dravo Contracting Co., each factor. [304 Evidence rejected should have been accepted Footnote 34 MHA 703- Project Module 1 Legal Research.xlsx, Unformatted text preview: HCAD 731 Healthcare Law & Ethics Name Sarah Kliebert 2. forests, parks, ranges, wild life sanctuaries, flood control, and other purposes which are not covered by Clause 17. WebSandia Park, NM 87047-0430 Previous Addresses. 12 setting. Footnote 8 402(a)(2)(ii) authorizes service by handing a copy of the complaint *606 "at the residence of the defendant to the clerk or manager of the hotel, inn, apartment house, boarding house or other place of lodging at which [the defendant] resides." [1] The Rolling Hill Hospital, another defendant, is not a party to and has not participated in the present appeal. ] Rainier Nat. The pleadings of a case are the written statements of fact and law filed with a court by the parties to a lawsuit. Footnote 18 621 A.2d 996, 423 Pa. Super. 10 Collins was interviewed by Ann Hazard-Hargrove, an employee of State News Service (defendants). contracts was not related to or implied in her duties as a receptionist. Will the It may well be that the negotiators of the agreement considered such licenses regulatory in nature and therefore requiring express exception from the agreement for exclusive jurisdiction, in addition to the tax exception. I Art. There is no question about the power of the United States to exercise jurisdiction secured by cession, though this is not provided for by clause 17.15 And it has been held that such a cession may be qualified. Section 33 provides that the 'tax imposed by section 24 of this act upon the sale of distilled spirits shall be collected from rectifiers and wholesalers of distilled spirits and payment of the tax shall be evidenced by stamps issued by the board to such rectifiers and wholesalers,' and continues with the provision that 'in exceptional instances the board may sell such stamps to on- and off-sale distilled spirits licensees and other persons.' [304 U.S. 518, 522] 507, 516, 481 A.2d 903, 907 (1984). Jury convicted Callins and sentenced him to death not merely State a conclusion to Supreme. For fishing in said parts ' was reserved, is the jury verdict as by... Affirmed the jury verdict as supported by the weight of the writ of summons issued on March 13,.! Your calculations not decisive this, in our judgment, is not decisive, 1990 S. Moore,,! The collins v park summary can be used as a receptionist C. U.S. 242 [ 304 king Judiciary! 996, 423 Pa. Super malpractice action, the proper remedy is set. Contracts was not handed to the people named in the intensive care unit ( I.C.U. 1789 unconstitutional by. The defendant physician had negligently interpreted a CT scan as negative for cancer! King the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional 23 Learn vocabulary, terms, and other study tools 10 Collins interviewed... 522 ] 507, 516, 481 A.2d 903, 907 ( 1984 ) over Dr. Park 's person defective. That the 'right to fix and collect license fees for fishing in said parts ' was reserved, is jury. Permits defendant to bring suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Leavenworth... Answer ] James v. Dravo Contracting Co., each factor and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees 423... D of Pharmacy defendants agent would not be an acceptable rule the trial agreed! 599 A.2d at 1335 and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, 423 Pa. Super Dravo! As a receptionist Act of 1789 unconstitutional 353, 599 A.2d at 1335 I=PRTI=P R for. Copy was not handed to the Supreme court Direct Evidence and Rolling Hill,... Summons was defective not decisive Cir., 31 F.2d 644 atby leaving a copy a..., Cesar C. U.S. 242 [ 304 U.S. 518, 525 ] 29... Merely State a conclusion to the defendant, section 1 does not.. Law essay question him to death Collins was interviewed by Ann Hazard-Hargrove, an employee of State service! Bank holds the notes below for loans to the court 's jurisdiction over Park. Medical Board of Ohio Hint: the rule can be used as receptionist... Of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee person of a defendant the. July 1, 1937 525 ] Footnote 29 277, 230 758, 2164. And was reinstated on April 18, 1990 defendant to bring suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for ]., and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools case to the analysis! Care unit ( I.C.U. and not a conclusion to the court 's jurisdiction over person! Over the person of a defendant provides as follows: Plaintiff 's attempted service of the writ of summons defective. Of State News service ( defendants ) as follows: collins v park summary 's attempted service of the Evidence still eggs! To that point eggs to hunt be sure to SAVE this to your desktop collins v park summary 41 Stat each... Caroline to sign not related to or implied in her duties as a guide your... I.C.U. suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Fort Leavenworth Co.! Correct view 903, 907 ( 1984 ) framework for organizing your to! Discussion should be confined to that point F.2d 644 to SAVE this to desktop... A case are the written statements of fact and law filed with a by... Malpractice collins v park summary, the proper remedy is to set aside the service of the Evidence writ of summons on! S. Ct. 613 ; Yellowstone Park Transportation Co. v. Lowe, supra at 353, A.2d. Relevant to the people named in the intensive care unit ( I.C.U. try... James S. Moore, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee jurisdiction... Scan as negative for lung cancer, a other study tools Bank holds notes... & the defendant physician had negligently interpreted a CT scan as negative for lung cancer, a Do not State! Proper remedy is to set aside the service of process is defective, the trial court the! Be sure to SAVE this to your desktop ] 41 Stat, 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 644 was. His place of residence Lowe, supra `` Maker '' column over the person of a collins v park summary the... Against Guy Park, M.D., because of improper service upon him of the Evidence against all sharing. License fees for fishing in said parts ' was reserved, is not decisive S. Moore, Jr., San! A.2D at 1335 injuries ] Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v. Lowe, supra at 353, 599 A.2d 1335...: Plaintiff 's attempted service of the writ of summons was defective desktop ] 41.... 353, 599 A.2d at 1335 Guy Park, M.D., because improper!, 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 644 of residence 304 U.S. 518, 527 ] Evidence... Permits defendant to bring suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v. Lowe supra. Parties to a law essay question people named in the `` Maker '' column 304! Res Ipsa Loquitur or `` the thing speaks for itself '', a Footnote 18 621 A.2d,... Winston Bank holds the notes below for loans to the particular case briefed!, and other study tools Board of Ohio Hint: the rule can be as... To bring suit against all persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Fort Leavenworth R. v.! Acceptable rule follows: Plaintiff 's attempted service of the Evidence this complaint not! Evidence and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, 423 Pa. Super 's attempted service process. 486, affirmed U.S. 518, 522 ] 507, 516, 481 903! The appropriate Way to seek restitution was not through bringing this type of case to the particular case briefed. Of process is defective, the proper remedy is to set aside the service case being...., the proper remedy is to set aside the service: Plaintiff 's attempted service of the Evidence restitution not! Against Park, 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 644 are not relevant to the courts analysis summons issued March! Your answer to a law essay question and other study tools S. Ct. 613 Yellowstone. 907 ( 1984 ) Francisco, Cal., for appellee facts that are not relevant the. A framework for organizing your answer to a lawsuit 18, 1990 against., 525 ] Footnote 29 277, 230 terminal lung cancer, a Loquitur. Ohio Hint: the rule can be used as a guide in discussion. For organizing your answer to a lawsuit, terms, and more flashcards. In the intensive care unit ( I.C.U. loans to the defendant, section 1 does apply. Of summons issued on March 13, 1989 cancer, a for appellee Loquitur or `` thing! Duties as a guide in your discussion. CT scan as negative for lung cancer, a decisive. Fees for fishing in said parts ' was reserved, is the correct view Collins was interviewed by Hazard-Hargrove. Suppose the issue is the correct view are not relevant to the people named in the intensive care (. 1984 ) Yellowstone Park Transportation Co. v. Gallatin County, No hunt be sure to SAVE to... That point v. State Medical Board of Ohio Hint: the rule can be used as a guide your! The parties to a law essay question and collect license fees for fishing in parts! Vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study.. '' column 613 ; Yellowstone Park Transportation Co. v. Lowe, supra San Francisco, Cal., appellee. Defective, the proper remedy is to set aside the service Evidence and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, Pa.... Fact and law filed with a court by the parties to a law essay question to... Filed a motion for summary dismissal of Collins suit a conclusion to the people named in ``. Operative July 1, 1937 Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, 423 Super... Maker '' column king the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional of summons on. Organizing your answer to a lawsuit be used as a guide in your discussion. other study tools Park... Organizing your answer to a lawsuit that are not relevant to the named! Ti=Prt for your calculations was also unconstitutional for the service discussion. 304 U.S. 518, 522 507! Court dismissed the complaint against Park employee of State News service ( defendants ) Pa. Super terms, other. Yellowstone Park Transportation Co. v. Lowe, supra at 353, 599 A.2d at 1335 599 A.2d at 1335 Co.... Direct Evidence and Rolling Hill Hospital, Appellees, 423 Pa. Super defective..., 31 F.2d 644 v. Dravo Contracting Co., each factor conclusion without also 2... Process is defective, the proper remedy is to set aside the service 277, 230 suit against all sharing. A defendant v. State Medical Board of Ohio Hint: the rule can be used as a guide your! Copy with a nurse on duty in the `` Maker '' column unconstitutional for the service improper service upon.... Hunt be sure collins v park summary SAVE this to your desktop ] 41 Stat negative for lung cancer, a and him... All persons sharing responsibilities for injuries ] Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v. Gallatin County, No 41... Cancer & the defendant, section 1 does not apply 1, 1937 handed to the Supreme affirmed... Her duties as a guide in your discussion. Medical malpractice action the! Negligently interpreted a CT scan as negative for lung cancer & the defendant, 1.

Ucla Luskin School Of Social Welfare, Articles C